Resolution
Green only after we
re-crawl and prove it.
Everything else in this category stops at the report. A recommendation here is a task that ends with evidence from your published site — not a box someone ticked.
Review what we suggest
See the exact change before anything moves.
The rewrite arrives as a before-and-after pair, checked against the length bands that matter and against the brand token the live copy already carried. Nothing is summarised — you read the literal string that would ship.
Approve it, on brand
Nothing is applied without you.
The engine proposes; you decide. Edit the wording, approve it as drafted, or reject it outright. There is no autopilot and no bulk-apply, because a machine writing your identity unread is the failure this product exists to prevent.
Watch a dry run
The whole thing, with nothing written.
Every change is simulated end to end before a single byte reaches your site. Each proposed value is checked for placeholder text, the wrong brand name and the wrong length, and the rollback is recorded per change — so if you do go ahead, going back is one step and not an archaeology project.
Apply it for real
Written to your platform through a real adapter.
The approved artifact is written through a real platform adapter — live on Framer today, with Webflow and GitHub pull-requests next. On every other platform you get the exact code and the place to paste it.
Publish to your platform
A separate, deliberate step.
Applying and publishing are kept apart on purpose. A change can sit staged while you look at it in context, and going live stays an act you perform rather than a side effect of approving something.
Validate and reconfirm
We re-crawl the live site and check.
The engine fetches your published page again and looks for the change in the delivered HTML. Present, and the finding turns green. Absent — a cache, a failed deploy, a theme that stripped it — and it stays open and tells you why.
And the loop closes.
Before — what the page said
“Living brand environments — built to evolve, engage, and perform.”
A machine could not say what the company built, or for whom.
After — applied, published, re-crawled, confirmed present
“REDSxP designs experience centres, innovation labs and brand environments for enterprises.”
Now it can answer the question — and quote you doing it.
Both lines are from the redsxp.com audit, shown with permission. The wording on the right is the client's own, approved by them before it went live — we do not write your identity, we make sure a machine can read the one you already have.
On the record
We wrote the answer. Google is quoting it.
The answer we structured
“REDSxP™ is an end-to-end experiential delivery model by Rubenius. It connects strategy, storytelling, technology, craft, psychology, performance, partners, and build logic into one system for delivering brand environments.”
From the client’s own Knowledge Model, approved by them, published to /faq as FAQPage markup.
Google AI Overview · 31 July 2026
“REDSxP™ is an end-to-end experiential delivery framework that connects strategy, storytelling, technology, and spatial design into a single system to build physical brand environments.”
Search: “What does REDSxP do”. Five sources listed, the /faq page first.
27 July 2026 — engagement note records Google already quoting the FAQ answer out of plain prose. No FAQPage markup existed on the site.
Then — the Knowledge Model was authored with the client, approved, and published as FAQPage markup.
31 July 2026 — the AI Overview cites the /faq page by name.
Shown with permission. We are not claiming to control Google — nobody can, and any tool that says otherwise is describing something it does not control. That is the sequence, with dates, and you can run the search yourself.
Everyone else stops
at the report.
No product is named below and no numbers are invented — these are capabilities, and you can check every row against any tool you already use.
Why you can check us
It’s their word against ours.That’s the whole point.
Every finding carries its evidence
Not a score with a shrug. Each issue names the pages it affects and quotes what it found, so you can verify it in view-source before you believe us.
“What is Framer?”Fixed means re-crawled, not ticked
A change turns green only after we fetch your published page again and confirm it is there. A typical audit tool stops at the report.
We never invent your identity
The words that go into your schema are the ones you approve. The engine proposes and shows its reasoning; you confirm or edit.
Platforms it writes to
Live example on this page: redsxp.com · 59 pages · 29 findings, each with evidence
Need some help?
Write to hello@sensate.design and one of us replies — usually the same day, always a person.