Recommendations
Know exactly what to improve next.
A list of two hundred issues is a way of telling somebody nothing. Legible ranks what to do by what it unblocks, shows the exact change before it is made, and never applies anything you have not read.
Recommendations on a real site
Real scores from the redsxp.com audit · 59 pages read · shown with permission
What that looked like
"Planar" appears in body copy where the organisation's own name belongs — 6 pages: /careers/brand-experience-strategist, /careers/content-spatial-storytelling-lead, /careers/project-partner-coordinator, /careers/spatial-experience-designer, /careers/technology-media-experience-producer, … (+1 more)
The fix: Replace every "Planar" in published copy with the organisation's brand name, then re-crawl — the string is indexable, so search and AI systems are attributing it to this site today.
Not an illustration. This is one of 29 findings from that audit, with the pages it appears on named in the report.
What you can check
- Work is ordered by what it unblocks, so the first task is never an impossible one.
- Rewrites arrive as a before-and-after pair — you read the literal string that would ship.
- Nothing is applied without your approval. There is no autopilot and no bulk-apply.
The engines behind it
Each scores one dimension and shows its evidence. These are the ones whose findings appear in this area.